Cleve for academics
Turn research notes into polished academic writing.
An AI-first workspace for academic writing and collaboration. Draft, organize sources, revise arguments, and work with collaborators in one shared context.
Your second brain for academic research
A unified academic workspace with unlimited collaborators
Draft, organize, and collaborate all in one place.
AI-assisted proofreading, citations, and literature search
Project-aware tools built into the writing workflow.
AI-driven automation for formatting and editing
Spend less time on cleanup and more time on ideas.
The standard for academic writing
Built around writing, notes, and shared context, Cleve brings drafting, collaboration, and AI-assisted editing into a single workflow, meeting academics where and how they already work.
One workspace for serious academic writing
Draft, organize, and collaborate in a single cloud-based workspace designed for long-form academic writing. No context switching, no scattered notes, and no separate chat tool to manage beside the work.
Methods & Interpretation
Edited just now
The initial findings suggest that collaborative review changed how participants described uncertainty during group analysis sessions.
[[Literature notes / cohort comparison]] — add stronger claim boundary and cite source memo from March.
Work with unlimited collaborators
Collaborate with as many colleagues as you need using real-time editing, comments, and shared project context. Cleve reduces version conflicts, manual merging, and slow review cycles so teams can stay focused.
Collaborative review dynamics
The initial findings suggest that collaborative review changed how participants described uncertainty during group analysis...
Please add the comparison group definition before the final sentence.
Reviewer A · 12m ago
Good point. I'll add the definition and ask Cleve to tighten the transition.
You · just now
AI that understands your paper
Project-aware AI works across the full context of your manuscript, including notes, past drafts, revisions, and collaborator feedback. It helps clarify ideas, check reasoning, and refine structure as the work evolves.
Methods & Interpretation
The initial findings suggest that collaborative review changed how participants described uncertainty during group analysis sessions.
Chat
The methods section argues that collaborative review alters how uncertainty is communicated. The key claim is well-supported but the comparison group is defined late.
Save time with built-in proofreading and formatting
Built-in drafting support, citation cleanup, source summaries, image-to-text conversion, and automated editing reduce manual cleanup, saving you time and keeping your writing clear and consistent.
Chat
Collaborative sensemaking in research teams
Nguyen, Patel · 2025 · Journal of Learning Systems
AI-assisted revision in long-form academic writing
Santos, Kim · 2024 · Digital Scholarship Review
Shared context and source-grounded feedback
Miller, Chen · 2023 · HCI